| Date of Order | Sections Invoked | Complainant & Respondent | Summary of Case | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of RERA Act, 2016; Rule 7 of WB RERA Rules, 2021; Category B_2 of New Extension Regulation (921-RERA); Category B_3 of New Extension Regulation (921-RERA); and general provisions of the RERA Act. |
Complainant: N/A Respondent: N/A vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (WBRERA), addresses the application for an extension of registration for the real estate project '188/2'. The Authority, after reviewing the submitted affidavits and supporting documents, found that an extension was necessary due to delays in project completion. Consequently, the Authority unanimously granted the extension of the project's registration for a period spanning from January 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. This grant is subject to several strict conditions and the imposition of a penalty of Rs 9,108/- for contravention of the relevant RERA regulations. Crucially, the promoter must: 1. Pay the stipulated penalty amount. 2. Submit a Notarized Affidavit detailing the complete work milestone for the project by the extended deadline (June 30, 2026). 3. Provide mandatory quarterly updates and submit detailed work milestones every 90 days thereafter. The Authority reserves the right to conduct unannounced inspections and may revoke the extension if any discrepancy or misrepresentation is found. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 3 of the RERA Act, Section 18 of the RERA Act, and Rule 17 of the West Bengal Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2021. |
Complainant: Madan Kumar Chaubey | Respondent: Durgapur Real Estate Private Limited vs WBRERA |
This order addresses a dispute regarding the failure to deliver a flat within the stipulated timeline. The primary legal contention raised by the Respondent was that the matter was not maintainable before the Authority because the project had obtained its Completion Certificate (C.C.) prior to the enforcement of the RERA Act. The Authority, however, ruled that the complaint is fully maintainable. The Authority dismissed the defense, noting that the point of non-maintainability should have been raised at the initial hearing, and that the C.C. status is irrelevant unless the project was registered under the Act. Finding that the Respondent failed to deliver the unit and had received a principal amount of Rs. 18,14,200/-, the Authority directed the Respondent to refund the full principal amount. The Respondent is mandated to refund Rs. 18,14,200/- along with interest calculated at the rate of SBI PLR + 2% per annum. This refund must be completed within 45 days of receiving the order via email, exclusively through bank transfer. The Complainant must provide bank details within three days. Failure to comply allows the Complainant to initiate an Execution Application. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of RERA, 2016; Rule 7 of WB RERA Rules, 2027; Rule 16(5) of WB RERA Rules, 2021. |
Complainant: Ideal Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent: West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority vs WBRERA |
This order addresses an application seeking an extension of the registration validity for a real estate project, which has undergone a name change. The Authority noted that while the applicant sought an extension because the project could not be completed within the original validity period, several procedural and informational gaps were identified. Consequently, the Authority did not grant the extension but issued stringent directions. The applicant is mandated to submit a notarized affidavit within seven days, addressing critical points including: 1. Providing a proper introduction of the project, as the name 'Aagaman' is not registered with the Authority. 2. Account for the funds collected from allottees of the previous project name. 3. Explaining the failure to apply formally for the name change. 4. Submitting audited account balances and expenditure details. 5. Providing a notarized copy and a detailed explanation of the rights and obligations under the Development and Management Agreement. Furthermore, the applicant must formally apply for the name change from the original project name to 'Aagaman' as per the relevant RERA Rules, also within seven days. A further hearing has been scheduled to review compliance with these mandatory directives. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of the RERA Act, 2016; Rule 7 of the WBRE Rules, 2021; B 3 category of the New Extension Regulation. |
Complainant: West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority
Respondent: N/A vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (WBRERA), addresses an application for the extension of the project registration for 'AAKASHJAN' APARTMENT. The Authority, after reviewing the submitted documents and considering the reasons for the delay in project completion, found that an extension was urgently required. Consequently, the Authority unanimously granted the extension of the project registration for a period from December 31, 2025, to December 30, 2026. Crucially, the extension is subject to several strict conditions and the imposition of a penalty. The Promoter is mandated to pay a penalty of Rs 9,630/- for contravention of the New Extension Regulation. Furthermore, the Promoter must submit a Notarized Affidavit detailing the work milestone for the entire extended period within 15 days. Ongoing compliance requires the Promoter to upload quarterly project updates and submit detailed work milestones every 90 days. The Authority reserves the right to conduct inspections and may revoke the extension if any discrepancy or misrepresentation is found. The final certificate of extension is contingent upon the payment of the penalty amount. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of RERA Act, 2016; Rule 7 of WB RERA Rules, 2021; Category I-Q of New Extension Regulation; B 3 category of New Extension Regulation; Form F of WB RERA Rules, 2021. |
Complainant: SANKAR MAHESHWARI FRAME WORK
Respondent: West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (WBRERA), addresses an application for the extension of the registration of the real estate project, ADIDEVA APARTMENT. After reviewing the submitted documentation and considering the reasons for the delay in project completion, the Authority unanimously decided to grant an extension of the project registration. The validity of the project is hereby extended for a period from September 15, 2025, to September 14, 2026. Crucially, the extension is subject to strict compliance and the imposition of a penalty of Rs 13,224/- for contravention of the relevant extension regulations. To secure the extension, the Promoter must: 1. Pay the stipulated penalty amount. 2. Submit a notarized affidavit detailing the plan for project completion by the extended date. 3. Adhere to rigorous reporting requirements, including uploading quarterly project updates on the WBRERA website and submitting detailed work milestones on a notarized affidavit every 90 days. The Authority reserves the right to conduct unannounced inspections and take stringent action, including the revocation of the extension, in case of any discrepancy or misrepresentation. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016; Rule 7 of the West Bengal Rules, 2021; and Category B_3 of the New Extension Regulation. |
Complainant: N/A Respondent: N/A vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the application for the extension of registration for the real estate project, 'AIKYATAN,' under the West Bengal Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The Authority, after reviewing the submitted affidavits and supporting documents, found that an extension was necessary due to delays in project completion. Consequently, the Authority unanimously granted the extension of the project's registration for a period spanning from January 1, 2026, to November 30, 2026. Crucially, the grant of extension is subject to strict compliance and the imposition of a penalty of Rs 7,938/- for contravention of the relevant RERA regulations. The Applicant-Promoter must adhere to several mandatory conditions: 1. Pay the stipulated penalty amount to the Authority. 2. Submit a Notarized Affidavit detailing the overall work milestone within 15 days. 3. Upload Quarterly Project Updates on the WBRERA website within 7 days of the quarter's end. 4. Submit a detailed Work Milestone on Notarized Affidavit every 90 days thereafter. The Authority reserves the right to conduct unannounced inspections and may revoke the extension if any discrepancy or misrepresentation is found. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. |
Complainant: Not specified
Respondent: Not specified vs WBRERA |
This order addresses an application for the extension of registration for the real estate project ‘ARANYAK’. The Authority noted that the project’s original registration validity expired on 25.05.2025, and the Promoter sought an extension period to complete the project and hand over units to allottees. After thorough examination of the submitted affidavits and documents, the Authority found that an extension was necessary. Consequently, the Authority unanimously granted the extension of the project’s registration for a period of one year, effective from 26.05.2025 to 25.05.2026. However, this grant is subject to several strict conditions. The Promoter is liable to pay a penalty of Rs. 14,500/- for contravention of the relevant regulations. The Authority mandated that the Promoter must submit a detailed Work Milestone Affidavit within 15 days and must also provide quarterly updates and work milestones every 90 days thereafter. Furthermore, the Authority reserved the right to conduct inspections at any time. The extension is contingent upon the timely payment of the penalty and adherence to all stipulated reporting requirements, failure of which may lead to the revocation of the extension. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of the RERA Act, 2016; Rule 7 of the West Bengal RERA Rules, 2021; and A 3/B 2 category of the New Extension Regulation (vide no- 921-RERA dated 19.08.25). |
Complainant: N/A
Respondent: West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (WBRERA), addresses the application for the extension of registration for the project, ARIHANT APARTMENT. After reviewing the submitted documents and considering the necessity for continued project completion, the Authority has unanimously decided to grant an extension of the project's registration. The validity period is hereby extended from the original expiry date of 30.10.2024 to 30.06.2026. Crucially, the extension is conditional and comes with the imposition of a penalty of Rs 23,712/- for contravention of the New Extension Regulation. To maintain compliance, the promoter must: 1. Pay the stipulated penalty amount. 2. Submit a detailed Work Milestone Affidavit for the entire extended period within 15 days. 3. Upload quarterly project updates on the WBRERA website and submit detailed work progress reports every 90 days. The Authority reserves the right to conduct inspections at any time and may revoke the extension if any discrepancy or misrepresentation is found. Compliance with these strict timelines is mandatory for the continued validity of the project. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Also cited: A 2/B 3 category of the New Extension Regulation vide no- 921-RERA dated 19.08.25. |
Complainant: D.P ASSOCITES
Respondent: West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (WBRERA), addresses the application for the extension of registration for the project, ASHIRBAD APARTMENT. After reviewing the submitted affidavits and supporting documents, the Authority acknowledged the delay in the project's completion and found an extension to be urgently required. Consequently, the Authority unanimously granted the extension of the project's registration period from December 21, 2024, to January 05, 2026. Crucially, this extension is subject to the imposition of a penalty amounting to Rs 21,584/- for contravention of the New Extension Regulation. The promoter must deposit this penalty amount to formalize the extension. Furthermore, the order mandates strict compliance conditions: 1. The promoter must submit a detailed Work Milestone Affidavit within 15 days. 2. Quarterly project updates and subsequent Work Milestones must be submitted every 90 days thereafter. 3. The Authority reserves the right to conduct inspections and take stringent action, including revocation of the extension, for any discrepancy or non-adherence to the stipulated timelines. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016; Category A 1/B 3 of the New Extension Regulation; and general provisions of the RERA Act. |
Complainant: N/A & Respondent: N/A vs WBRERA |
This order addresses an application seeking an extension of the registration for a real estate project, whose original validity had expired. After reviewing the submitted documentation and hearing the arguments, the Authority determined that an extension was urgently required due to delays in project completion. Consequently, the Authority unanimously granted the extension of the project's registration for a period spanning from October 1, 2025, to September 30, 2026. However, this extension is conditional and comes with significant compliance requirements. The Promoter has been penalized an amount of Rs 59,108/- for contravening the New Extension Regulation, which must be paid to the Authority before the certificate is issued. Furthermore, the Promoter must submit a notarized affidavit detailing the project's work milestone for the entire extended period within 15 days. Ongoing compliance mandates include uploading quarterly project updates and submitting detailed work milestones every 90 days. The Authority reserves the right to conduct unannounced inspections and take stringent action, including revocation, for any misrepresentation or non-compliance. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 18 of RERA, 2016; Rule 1r & 1g of WB RERD Rules, 2021; and Section 63 of RERA, 2016. |
Complainant: Subhra Mitra
Respondent: Evanie lnfrstructure Pvt. Ltd vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority, addresses a complaint concerning the failure to hand over possession of a flat and non-compliance with a prior Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). The Authority first noted the Supreme Court's directive transferring jurisdiction from the erstwhile authority to the RERA. After reviewing the records and hearing both parties, the Authority found that the developer failed in its obligation to complete the project and adhere to the terms of the MoU. Consequently, the Authority cancelled the MoU. It directed the developer to refund the remaining principal amount of ₹3,27,400/-. Crucially, the refund must also include interest calculated at the rate of SBI Prime Lending Rate + 2%, starting from the respective dates of payments made by the aggrieved party until the date of realization. The developer is mandated to complete the bank transfer of the full amount within 45 days of receiving the order. The order further warns that failure to comply will allow the aggrieved party to file an Execution Application, making the developer liable for daily penalties, which may cumulatively extend up to five percent of the estimated project cost. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 6 of RERA Act, 2016; Rule 7 of WBRERA Rules, 2021; Category E.rQ of New Extension Regulation; B 3 category of New Extension Regulation; A 2lB 3 category of New Extension Regulation. |
Complainant: The Applicant (AKANKSHIT COMMODITIES PVT LTD)
Respondent: West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority vs WBRERA |
This order, issued by the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (WBRERA), addresses the application for extending the registration of the project, CITRINE GEMS CITY. The Authority, after reviewing the promoter's affidavit and supporting documents, has unanimously decided to grant an extension of the project registration. The validity period is hereby extended from October 1, 2025, to September 30, 2026. Crucially, the extension is granted subject to the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 2,90,412/- for contravention of the New Extension Regulation. The Authority mandates that the promoter must deposit this penalty amount before receiving the official certificate. Furthermore, the order establishes strict compliance requirements: 1. The promoter must submit a detailed Work Milestone Affidavit within 15 days. 2. Quarterly project updates must be uploaded to the WBRERA website. 3. Regular Work Milestones must be submitted every 90 days. The Authority reserves the right to conduct unannounced inspections and warns that any discrepancy or misrepresentation will lead to stringent action, including the revocation of the extension. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 18 of RERA Act, 2076; Rule 17 of WB RERA Rules, 2021; Section 38 read with Section 61 of RERA Act, 2076. |
Complainant: Moniruddin Mandal
Respondent: Tapas Kumar Bhagat vs WBRERA |
This order addresses a complaint concerning the sale of a booked flat and the non-compliance with a previous regulatory directive. The Authority noted that the respondent violated a final order dated 29.05.2019, which had mandated the immediate delivery of possession and registration of the property. Furthermore, the Authority found that the respondent suppressed the material fact that the flat had already been sold to a third party. Given that the property has been transferred, the Authority determined that the only viable remedy is a refund of the principal amount paid, along with statutory interest. Consequently, the Authority directed the respondent to refund a principal amount of Rs. 17,43,300/- (Rupees seventeen lakhs forty-three thousand three hundred) plus interest calculated at the rate of SBI PLR + 2% per annum. This payment must be made via bank transfer to the complainant's account within 90 days of receiving the order. The complainant was directed to submit the necessary bank details within three days. Failure to comply with this refund order will result in the imposition of penalties under the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act. The matter is scheduled for review in June 2024. | |
| X-Y-Z | no section has been evoked. |
Complainant: Moniruddin Mandal & Respondent: Tapas Kumar Bhagat vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the failure of the developer to refund the principal amount of Rs. 17,43,300/- along with accrued interest, despite repeated directives from the Authority. The Authority noted the developer’s attempt to mislead the proceedings by making misrepresentations regarding pending appeals, which was strongly cautioned against. Furthermore, the Authority highlighted that the developer had sold the booked property to a third party, constituting a breach of trust. While the developer cited medical emergencies and requested an extension, the Authority, in a final opportunity, granted a revised deadline. The developer is hereby directed to refund the Principal Amount in 2-3 installments by November 30, 2024. The first installment must be paid within 15 days of receiving the order via email. The Authority emphasized that failure to comply with this payment schedule will compel the Authority to initiate stringent legal action under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The matter of interest payment and compliance will be reviewed on the next hearing date. | |
| X-Y-Z | 1. Section 40 of the erstwhile West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 read with Rule 27 of the erstwhile west Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Rules, 2018. 2. Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 read with Rule |
Complainant: Animesh Misra
Respondent: Evanie lnfrastructure Pvt. Ltd vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the review of execution proceedings for a refund amount due to the complainant, which had been initiated following a final order passed by the Authority. The proceedings were previously sent to the District Magistrate for recovery. The Authority notes that the erstwhile West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act was declared ultra vires by the Supreme Court (SC) on May 12, 2023. Crucially, the SC clarified that the striking down of the old Act does not invalidate previous orders or sanctions. All such prior orders, including those passed during execution, must be executed as if they were issued under the current RERA framework. Finding that no substantial progress had been made in the execution before the District Magistrate, the Authority invoked the SC's directive. Consequently, the Authority has directed the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas, to execute the original order dated 06.11.2019 in favor of the complainant expeditiously, within one month of receiving the certified copy. Furthermore, the Authority directed the DM to ensure the complainant is kept fully informed of all communications regarding the status of the execution proceedings. The Secretary is also directed to provide necessary certified copies to the District Magistrate. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, read with Rule 25 of the West Bengal Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2021. |
Complainant: Sanjib Sarkar
Respondent: Evanie lnfrastructure Private Limited vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the review of execution proceedings concerning a refund amount due to the complainant, following a final order passed by the Authority. The proceedings were initiated after the promoter failed to comply with the original directive. The matter was sent for execution to the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas. The Authority noted that the original governing legislation (WB-HIRA Act) was subsequently declared *ultra vires* by the Supreme Court, which clarified that all prior orders must be executed as if they were passed under the RERA framework. Finding that no substantial progress had been made in the execution process, the Authority invoked the Supreme Court's directive. Consequently, the Authority directed the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas, to execute the original order dated 06.11.2019 expeditiously, within one month of receiving the certified copy. Furthermore, the DM is mandated to keep the complainant sufficiently informed of all communications regarding the status of the execution proceedings. The Authority also directed the Secretary of the WBRERA to ensure all necessary copies are promptly forwarded to the concerned District Magistrate. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 40 (WBHIRA Act, 2017), Rule 27 (WBHIRA Rules, 2018), Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Article 142 (Constitution), Section 40 (RERA Act, 2016), and Rule 25 (RERA Rules, 2021). |
Complainant: Prakash Chandra Gupta
Respondent: Greentech IT City Pvt. Ltd. vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the execution status of a prior directive passed by the erstwhile regulatory authority concerning the recovery of funds due to land revenue arrears. The proceedings were complicated by the Supreme Court declaring the original state-level housing act (WB-HIRA) ultra vires (invalid) in 2021. However, the Authority notes the critical intervention of the Supreme Court in May 2023, which clarified that all orders passed under the defunct state act, including those related to execution, must still be executed as if they were issued under the central Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Given that the execution process before the District Magistrate remains stalled and lacks substantial progress, the Authority invokes the Supreme Court's mandate. Consequently, the Authority directs the District Magistrate of North 24-Parganas to execute the original order dated 04.02.2020 expeditiously, within one month from the receipt of the certified copy. Furthermore, the DM is mandated to ensure the complainant receives copies of all communications made regarding the execution proceedings. The Authority also directs the Secretary to provide certified copies of the relevant orders to the DM to ensure compliance. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 18 of RERA, 2016 (read with Rule 17 & 18 of WB RERA Rules, 2021); Section 63 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. |
Complainant: Atanu Datta
Respondent: Riverbank Developers Private Limited vs WBRERA |
This order addresses a complaint concerning the failure to deliver possession of an allotted apartment within the stipulated timeframe. The complainant alleged that the developer failed to hand over the flat by the agreed date, leading to a claim for cancellation and refund of the principal amount paid. After reviewing the submissions and hearing both parties, the Authority concluded that the developer was grossly negligent in fulfilling its obligation to provide possession within the scheduled timeline. Consequently, the Authority has directed the developer to refund the principal amount of Rs. 21,43,718/-, after deducting any taxes or GST paid to competent authorities. Furthermore, the developer must pay interest on this amount at the rate of SBI Prime Lending Rate + 2% per annum, calculated from the respective dates of payment made by the complainant until the date of actual realization. The refund must be transferred to the complainant's bank account within 45 days of receiving the order. The order also stipulates that failure to comply within the specified period will result in a penalty, potentially extending up to five percent of the estimated cost of the real estate project, as per Section 63 of the RERA Act. | |
| X-Y-Z | Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, read with Rule 25 of the West Bengal Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2021. |
Complainant: Subhadip Ghosh
Respondent: Eva nie I nfrastructur"Virirrt" Limited vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the execution of a refund amount due, originally mandated by an authority order dated 25.11.2019. The proceedings were initiated after the promoter failed to comply with the original directive. The Authority noted that the matter was previously sent for execution to the District Magistrate, but the complainant reported a lack of substantial progress. Crucially, the Authority referenced the Supreme Court's directive (May 2021), which upheld the validity of all orders passed under the erstwhile WB-HIRA Act, even after the Act was struck down, mandating their execution under the Central RERA framework. Given the inaction, the Authority exercised its power to intervene. It hereby directs the District Magistrate of North 24-Parganas to execute the original order expeditiously, within one month of receiving the certified copy. Furthermore, the DM is directed to keep the complainant fully informed of all subsequent communications regarding the execution status. The Authority also mandated the Secretary to provide certified copies of all relevant orders to the District Magistrate, ensuring the matter moves forward under the current RERA provisions. The matter is scheduled for review in December 2023. | |
| X-Y-Z | Rule 25 of RER Rules, 2016; B Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913; Section 61 of RERA, 2016; Section 40 of RERA, 2016 read with Rule 25 of WB RER Rules, 2021. |
Complainant: Shirsendu Basu
Respondent: Evanie Infrastructure Private Limited vs WBRERA |
This order addresses the execution hearing for a previous directive concerning the refund of funds. The Authority noted that the respondent failed to comply with the original order dated 20.07.2023, despite being directed to refund the full amount within a specified timeframe. Finding the respondent non-compliant and in violation of the Authority's directives, the Authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) under Section 61 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. To ensure the recovery of the due amount and the imposed penalty, the Authority mandated the execution of the order through the District Magistrate of North 24-Parganas. This action is taken under the provisions of Section 40 of the RERA Act, 2016, read with Rule 25 of the West Bengal RERA Rules, utilizing the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act, 1913. The Authority directed the Secretary of the regulatory body to immediately send certified copies of the execution order to the District Magistrate. The District Magistrate was consequently directed to initiate the recovery process within one month and submit a compliance report within six weeks. |